diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'info/diplomacy.html')
-rw-r--r-- | info/diplomacy.html | 105 |
1 files changed, 105 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/info/diplomacy.html b/info/diplomacy.html new file mode 100644 index 0000000..90ed232 --- /dev/null +++ b/info/diplomacy.html @@ -0,0 +1,105 @@ +<!doctype html> +<meta name="viewport" content="width=device-width, initial-scale=1"> +<title>Maria - Negotiation</title> +<link rel="stylesheet" href="/fonts/fonts.css"> +<link rel="stylesheet" href="/style.css"> +<style> +body{max-width:50rem;margin:0 auto;} +dt{font-weight:bold} +</style> +<body> +<article> + +<h1> +Discussing and making deals in MARIA. +</h1> + +<hr> + +<h2> +The following definitions should be used in diplomatic talks and deals: +</h2> + +<dl> +<dt> +No aggression: +<dd> +Between the deal partners, there will be +<ul> +<li> +no combat (see below); and +<li> +no elimination of supply trains; and +<li> +no conquest of fortresses; and +<li> +no blocking of supply paths; and +<li> +no hussars use. +</ul> +<dt> +No combat: +<dd> +The deal partners will not move their generals into a position where a combat +would result with the deal partner. +<dt> +No hussars: +<dd> +Austria will not use hussars against the deal partner. +<dt> +No protection: +<dd> +The deal partner X will not protect the stated fortresss(es). +<dt> +Core-Austria: +<dd> +Austrian territitories on the Bohemia map. +<dt> +Abbreviation of powers: +<dd> +A=Austria; F=France; Pr=Prussia; PA=Pragmatic Army; Bav=Bavaria; Sax=Saxony +<dt> +Other abbreviations: +<dd> +TC=Tactical Card; PC=Political Card; PD=Political Display +</dl> + +<h2> +General concepts: +</h2> + +<ul> +<li> +Be precise with your language! +<li> +A deal should ALWAYS have a duration. +<li> +If something is not mentioned in the deal, it is not part of the deal. +For instance: No aggression between F & PA on the Flanders map would allow F to conquer A controlled fortresses +(but not jointly controlled electoral fortresses). +<li> +You can always make exceptions, for instance you could say: +<ul> +<li> +No aggression between A and Pr, but Pr may conquer the currently A controlled +Breslau, or +<li> +No aggression between F and A on the Flanders map; or +<li> +No agression between F and A, but A may use Hussars against F. +<li> +No agression between F & Bav and A, but A may use Hussars against F (but not +against Bav). +</ul> +<li> +<b><i>No deal can ever violate an inherent game rule.</i></b> +For instance, if the deal is: A will not +protect Breslau, and an Austrian general has to retreat, and the only option will end up +in a position where Breslau is protected, then the game rules prevail (and the deal must +be violated). +</ul> + +<hr> + +<p style="text-align:center"> +<img src="/maria/images/suit_hearts.svg" height="32"> |