diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'data.js')
| -rw-r--r-- | data.js | 2 |
1 files changed, 1 insertions, 1 deletions
@@ -36,7 +36,7 @@ scenarios: [ {"number":32,"expansion":"English Civil War","name":"2nd Newbury","date":"27 October 1644","players":[{"name":"Parliamentarians","cards":[384,385,386,387,388],"morale":1,"tactical":16},{"name":"Royalists","cards":[389,390,391,392,393],"morale":2,"tactical":16}],"lore_text":"Attacked from opposite directions and outnumbered more than two to one, the King appeared to be doomed. But the enemy just couldn't coordinate; stubborn Royalist resistance denied Essex anything more than a tactical victory.","wikipedia":"https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Second_Battle_of_Newbury"}, {"number":33,"expansion":"English Civil War","name":"Naseby","date":"14 June 1645","players":[{"name":"Royalists","cards":[394,395,396,397,398,399],"morale":2,"tactical":20},{"name":"Parliamentarians","cards":[400,401,402,403,404,405,406],"morale":2}],"lore_text":"The New Model Army at last achieved decisive victory at Naseby, leaving Charles without a field army. It was also a political victory, as they captured (and published) letters in which the King plotted with foreign troops against his subjects.","wikipedia":"https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_Naseby"}, {"number":34,"expansion":"English Civil War","name":"Tippermuir","date":"1 September 1644","players":[{"name":"Covenanters","cards":[407,408,409,410,411,412],"morale":4},{"name":"Royalists","cards":[413,414,415,416,417,418],"morale":0}],"rule_text":"If any Royalist card Routs, the Covenanters win immediately.","lore_text":"Meanwhile, in Scotland, Montrose sought to block the intervention of the Solemn League and Covenant, and near Perth won a decisive victory – supposedly losing only one man to Elcho's two thousand dead. Yeah, sure.","wikipedia":"https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_Tippermuir"}, -{"number":35,"expansion":"English Civil War","name":"Auldearn","date":"9 May 1645","players":[{"name":"Covenanters","cards":[419,420,421,422,423,424],"morale":5},{"name":"Royalists","cards":[425,426,427,428,429,430,431,432],"morale":0}],"rule_text":"If any Royalist card Routs, the Covenanters win immediately.","lore_text":"400 desperate men defend Auldearn from a Covenanter army nearly 2,000 strong. Their only hope is that Montrose will arrive in time to turn the tide. He better hurry it up!","wikipedia":"https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_Auldearn"}, +{"number":35,"expansion":"English Civil War","name":"Auldearn","date":"9 May 1645","players":[{"name":"Covenanters","cards":[419,420,421,422,423,424],"morale":5},{"name":"Royalists","cards":[425,426,427,428,429,430,431,432],"morale":0}],"rule_text":"If any Royalist card Routs, the Covenanters win immediately. If Lawers Retires before Montrose has Commanded any formations, the Irish Left and Right immediately come out of reserve.","lore_text":"400 desperate men defend Auldearn from a Covenanter army nearly 2,000 strong. Their only hope is that Montrose will arrive in time to turn the tide. He better hurry it up!","wikipedia":"https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_Auldearn"}, {"number":36,"expansion":"Base Game","name":"Pharsalus","date":"9 August 48 BCE","players":[{"name":"Gnaeus Pompeius Magnus","cards":[433,434,435,436],"morale":2},{"name":"Gaius Iulius Caesar","cards":[437,438,439,440,441],"morale":2}],"lore_text":"The decisive battle of Caesar's Civil War saw him square off against his old ally Pompey the Great. Knowing he would lose a straightforward clash of arms, Caesar gambled everything on a bold stratagem.","wikipedia":"https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_Pharsalus"}, {"number":37,"expansion":"Base Game","name":"Inkerman","date":"5 November 1854","players":[{"name":"Russian Empire","cards":[442,443,444,445],"morale":1},{"name":"Anglo-French Alliance","cards":[446,447,448,449,450],"morale":2}],"lore_text":"In a dense fog, a massive – but badly coordinated – Russian army launched a surprise attack. As the fog lifted and fresh Allied troops poured in, their desperate, doomed defense improbably turned into a lopsided victory.","wikipedia":"https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_Inkerman"}, {"number":38,"expansion":"The Grand Alliance","name":"Fleurus","date":"1 July 1690","players":[{"name":"French","cards":[451,452,453,454,455,456],"morale":1},{"name":"The Grand Alliance","cards":[457,458,459,460,461,462,463,464],"morale":3,"tactical":22}],"lore_text":"Luxembourg split the French army in two, attempting a risky double envelopment of Waldeck's line. He succeeded, and the enemy only escaped total destruction by the skin of its teeth. Both players should read the \"Retreat to Nivelles\" card carefully before playing.","wikipedia":"https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_Fleurus_(1690)"}, |